- Follow FBA’s activities from the below list.
- Seminars held between October 2010 & November 2017 → PAST SEMINARS
- Use below –Choose a date using calendar– option to filter a different interval (starts from December 2017)
| RECENT SEMINARS |
“ESG as the latest entrant to the alphabet soup: The challenges and dynamics of Business & Society research”
by Dirk Matten
York University
Place: MA-330
Abstract
ESG (‘Environment, Social, Governance’) has recently joined the many labels in the ‘Business & Society’ field. I will critically assess the emergence of ESG, the reasons for such new language, and the challenges it poses. In doing so, I will relate my ongoing research work to three core questions that have been defining for the ‘Business & Society’ field for the last 40 years. (1) What is the status of the business case versus the moral case for business responsibility to society? (2) What are the dynamics of business responsibility, temporarily and comparatively? (3) What are the implications of Business & Society research for ongoing work in the field, and for the notion of business in mainstream business/management research?
Bio
Dirk Matten holds the Hewlett-Packard Chair in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) at the Schulich School of Business, York University in Toronto, Canada. He is also the founding director of Schulich’s Centre of Excellence in Responsible Business and was instrumental in making his school one of the world’s top ranked institutions in sustainable business research and education. He has a doctoral degree and the habilitation from Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf in Germany.
Prof. Matten has published 30 books and edited volumes as well some 100 journal articles and book chapters which are cited widely and received numerous international awards. For instance, his 2008 paper on ‘Implicit and Explicit CSR’ (with J. Moon) has won the “Academy of Management Review Paper of the Decade” Award, for. He also received the Max Weber-Award for Business Ethics from the Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft, Berlin, for his textbook “Business Ethics” (with A. Crane, OUP). In 2023, he was ranked in the top five scholars in Political Science in Canada by research.com
He has a truly global focus in his approach on CSR, having taught and done research at academic institutions in Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Britain, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Italy, Turkey, and the USA. In 2018/19 he held the prestigious Gourlay Visiting Professor of Ethics in Business at Trinity College of the University of Melbourne. He is also a Visiting Professor at the University of London, the University of Nottingham, and Copenhagen Business School.
“Brand – pandemic fit and eWOM intentions: The role of ad appeals and future focus”
by Ayşegül Özsomer
Koç University
Place: MA-330
Abstract
Since the outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020 brands have quickly adapted the content of their advertising to include pandemic related social and health messages. This paper explores the relationship of fit between the advertised brand and the pandemic as a potential influence on consumers’ eWOM intentions in an advanced and emerging market. Inspired by metacognitive fluency theory, we propose and find that pandemic adapted advertisements for brands that are high on brand-pandemic fit enhance consumers’ eWOM intentions in both markets. This relationship is stronger for experiential ad appeals and future focus in the ads. In terms of temporal focus, building on construal level theory, we find that the effect of fit on eWOM is increased by using future focused ads. Together, the results establish relationships between brand-pandemic fit of advertisements, ad liking, ad-appeals, future focus, and eWOM intentions. We conclude with a discussion of how brand advertising can facilitate societal well-being as high fit brands help individuals solve pandemic related challenges and generate more consumer engagement via eWOM intentions.
Bio
Ayşegül Özsomer is Professor of Marketing at Koç University, Istanbul, Türkiye. She specializes in global marketing, branding, emerging markets and the role of marketing in tough economic times. Prof. Özsomer has taught, consulted, and conducted research in the US before joining Koç University. She has published in top scholarly journals including the Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Journal of International Marketing and Human Resource Management. She received several research awards including the 2011 Gerald Hills Best Paper Award for ten-year impact on entrepreneurship research, the 2013 Cavusgil Award for her paper investigating the interplay between global and local brands, and most recently the 2023 Cavusgil Award for her paper on marketing agility. Her research is well read and well cited with more than 5100 google scholar citations. Dr. Özsomer has held visiting scholar positions at the Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, the Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA, and Harvard University. Her co-authored book, The New Emerging Market Multinationals: Four Strategies for Disrupting Markets and the Competition (McGraw Hill) was selected the best strategy book by Business+Strategy. She is the incoming Editor in Chief of the Journal of International Marketing, an American Marketing Association Journal published by SAGE. https://www.ama.org/press-releases/aysegul-ozsomer-selected-as-next-journal-of-international-marketing-editor-in-chief/
‘Inferring Mutual Fund Intra-Quarter Trading An Application to ESG Window Dressing’
by Dong Lou
London School of Economics
https://zoom.us/j/3370698252?pwd=OWRmQ1hNNWhRWng2QnhsTENzK1hGUT09&omn=91233540305
Meeting ID: 337 069 8252
Abstract
We develop a novel method to infer intra-quarter trading of individual mutual funds. Although mutual funds report their holdings once every quarter, they are required to report their portfolio returns every day. After a mutual fund executes a trade, its reported portfolio returns further deviate from its quarter-end-holdings-based returns (assuming no trading).This sudden jump in return deviation allows us to infer the transaction date and amount.We apply our method to studying strategic trading of ESG stocks by mutual funds aroundquarter ends. Our evidence suggests that in recent years, mutual funds buy high-ESG stocksand sell low-ESG stocks right before quarter ends, and reverse their trades at the beginning of the next quarter. This trading pattern is concentrated among mutual funds right around the cutoff of four and five ESG rating stars, which have the strongest incentives to boost ESG performance. These trades also affect prices: high-ESG stocks outperform low-ESG stocks right before quarter ends, and underperform at the beginning of the next quarter.
Bio
Dong Lou is a Professor of Finance at the London School of Economics, a Research Fellow at the Centre for Economic Policy Research, and an Academic Consultant and Visitor to the Bank of England. He is an Associate Editor of the Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Economics, and Management Science. Professor Lou teaches in the Master’s, Executive Education, and Doctoral Programs at the London School of Economics.
Professor Lou frequently advises government organizations and regularly consults for investment management companies. His research has been published in top academic journals, has won many awards, and is frequently profiled in financial media outlets including the Wall Street Journal, Forbes, and Bloomberg. His main research areas include asset pricing, investment management, behavioral finance, and the Chinese financial markets. Professor Lou received a PhD in Financial Economics from Yale University in 2009 and an undergraduate degree in Computer Science from Columbia University in 2004 (https://personal.lse.ac.uk/loud).
“Political Liquidity Creation: Electoral Cycles and State-Owned Banks”
by Mehmet Özsoy
Özyeğin University
Place: MA-330
Abstract
This paper compares the liquidity creation of state-owned banks in Turkey with that of privately-owned banks both in normal times and around election times. Turkey provides an excellent laboratory to explore the role of state ownership in the banking industry as it is a country with a long history of state ownership of banks. Applying Berger and Bouwman (2009) framework to measure liquidity creation and using quarterly detailed regulatory dataset for the period of 2002-2017, we find that state banks create more liquidity per unit of assets than their private counterparts. More importantly, the documented statistically significant difference widens during the election quarters. Our findings suggest a divergence between behaviors of state and private banks because of political elections. We further show that the liquidity creation of state-owned banks around political elections, with respect to that of privately-owned banks, seem to not increase bank risk measured by RoaVol and Zscore but dampens state-owned banks performance measured by Roa. We finally document that the size effect can only explain the unconditional difference but it does not explain the documented difference around election quarters.
Bio
S. Mehmet Özsoy is an Assistant Professor of Financial Economics at Ozyegin University. He received his Ph.D. in Economics (2013) from Duke University, his M.A. in Economics from Koç University (2008) and his B.A. in Economics from Boğaziçi University (2006). His research interests include financial economics, financial intermediation and climate finance.
“Voice-Pitch Bias in Political and Economic Environments”
by Özgür Kıbrıs
Sabancı University
Place: MA-330
Abstract
We present two studies that respectively analyze the implications of voice pitch in political and economic decisions. In the first study, we use an online experiment to analyze the relative effect on voter behavior of a candidate’s voice pitch and policy stance. We demonstrate a strong voice-pitch bias: between candidates who are identical in every other aspect, voters are more likely to choose the one with the lower voice-pitch, and more so in elections between men than women candidates. We then introduce a novel phenomenon: persistence of voice-pitch bias is the amount of policy difference needed to compensate for voice-pitch bias. While persistence is also gender-dependent, the effect is now reversed: voice-pitch bias is more persistent in elections between women than men candidates. As a possible mechanism, we show that voters perceive candidates with lower voice-pitch as more competent and trustworthy. The second study is an > ongoing project where we aim to experimentally analyze whether employers’ evaluation of current or potential employees is subject to a voice-pitch bias. If this is the case, we aim to measure the premium an employee receives/foregoes in response to a unit change in her voice pitch, the so-called voice-pitch premium. We present the design of our experiment as well as some preliminary findings from its first stage.
Bio
Professor Kıbrıs received a BS in industrial engineering in 1992 and an MA in economics in 1995 from Bilkent university. He received his PhD in economics in 2000 from University of Rochester.
Professor Kıbrıs joined Sabancı University in 2001 as an assistant professor. He became an associate professor in 2009 and a full professor in 2015. Outside Sabancı University, Professor Kıbrıs also worked at Universite Catholique de Louvain (2000-2001), University of Rochester (2006-2007), and Duke University (2011-2012). At Sabancı University, he previously served as the dean (2017-2020) and the vice-dean (2016-2017) of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences.
Professor Kıbrıs’ research and teaching activities focus on behavioral economics, decision theory, political economy, game theory, and economic design. The Turkish Academy of Sciences has awarded his research with an Incentive Award in 2003 and a GEBIP Award in 2006. His teaching activities on these fields were awarded by Sabancı University with a Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Teaching Award in 2010. He is a fellow of the Murat Sertel Center for Advanced Economic Studies.
“Investing in Misallocation”
by Şelale Tüzel
University of South California
Place: MA-330
Abstract
We document that 20% of Compustat firms have above-median investment rates despite having below-median marginal product of capital (MPK), seemingly “misallocating” productive resources. These firms are typically younger and significantly more likely to experience a substantial upward jump in their sales and MPK in the following years. They account for a significant share of innovative activity and their investments predict future aggregate productivity in the economy, creating value in ways not captured by their MPK. We propose and estimate a simple endogenous firm growth model that captures the key features of the cross-section of firms and allows for counterfactual analysis. Hypothetical firm investment policies that ignore the potential for future jumps reduce MPK and investment dispersion but also lower aggregate productivity.
Bio
Professor Selale Tuzel is an Associate Professor of Finance and Business Economics and serves as the Academic Director of the Real Estate Finance and Development program at USC Marshall School of Business. She holds a PhD in Management (Finance) from UCLA’s Anderson School of Management. Her research spans various areas, including macro-finance, household finance, and real estate, with contributions in both empirical and theoretical domains. Her work has been published in leading finance, management, and economics journals such as the Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Economics, and the Review of Financial Studies. Currently, she holds the role of Associate Editor at Management Science. Professor Tuzel primarily teaches Real Estate Finance courses to graduate and undergraduate students at the Marshall School of Business.
“Offshoring, Automation, and the Legitimacy of Efficiency”
by Stefano Puntoni
Wharton School
https://zoom.us/j/3370698252?pwd=OWRmQ1hNNWhRWng2QnhsTENzK1hGUT09&omn=99687732034
Meeting ID: 337 069 8252
Abstract:
Collective layoffs can occur for many reasons, often related to a firm’s pursuit of greater efficiency and cost reduction, and they tend to trigger negative reactions among the public. Anecdotal evidence suggests that offshoring, one of the most controversial and politicized aspects of globalization, evokes particularly negative reactions. We propose a social contract account of consumer reactions to collective layoffs and demonstrate differential consumer responses to collective layoffs due to offshoring versus other reasons, such as automation. Layoffs due to offshoring are perceived as an especially egregious violation of the normative expectation that firms should support the local community. Data from eleven experimental studies (N = 6,773), public consumer responses to layoffs in a large online community (N = 29,045), and layoff announcements in the European Union (N = 1,261) confirm that consumers react more negatively to collective layoffs due to offshoring compared to automation or other reasons. Supporting our social contract account, the negative effect of offshoring is stronger when offshoring affects workers in the consumers’ home (vs. foreign) country, when the firm is domestic (vs. foreign), and when most customers are domestic (vs. foreign).
Bio:
Stefano Puntoni is the Sebastian S. Kresge Professor of Marketing at The Wharton School and the Co-Director of AI at Wharton. He holds a PhD in marketing from London Business School and a degree in Statistics and Economics from the University of Padova, in his native Italy. His research has appeared in many leading academic journals and major managerial outlets. Most of his ongoing research investigates how new technology is changing consumption and society, including how humans are adopting and evolving with AI. He is a former MSI Young Scholar and MSI Scholar, and the winner of several grants and awards. He is currently an Associate Editor at the Journal of Consumer Research and at the Journal of Marketing. Stefano teaches in the areas of AI and automation, marketing strategy, and decision making.
“Changing the Market with Stories: Social Media Influencers as Innovation Catalysts”
by Julien Cayla
Nanyang Business School
https://zoom.us/j/8059866836?pwd=bTNhc3JzV3NGRUJmQ0NUNks1VjdUdz09&omn=96323553521
Meeting ID: 805 986 6836
Abstract:
Social media influencers have largely been portrayed as glamorous personalities who use their followers to benefit brands. But what if influencers defied this stereotype and did more than just spread brand messages to passionate fans? What if influencers played a key role in making an entire market more innovative? In this study, we examine a rapidly evolving context—the dynamic agricultural market in rural India—to explore the role influencers play in innovation. We show that influencers’ social media stories operate as powerful narrative devices stimulating market innovation by: 1) making market knowledge more understandable; 2) inspiring new ways of acting and thinking about the market; 3) spreading new dominant values; and 4) changing power dynamics within the market. Our research thus complements the existing literature on influencers by assigning them a new role: Influencers as innovation catalysts. Given the urgent need for innovation in the Global South, these findings should be particularly valuable for businesses and policy makers. Social media influencers are far more than mere brand ambassadors. They change the market with their stories.
Bio:
Julien Cayla is an Associate Professor of Marketing at Nanyang Business School (Singapore). His work has been published in outlets such as the Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Marketing, Organization Studies, Journal of Retailing and MIT Sloan Management Review. Most recently, he has been working on the pains and pleasures of service interactions. Passionate about India, he is the founder of the consumer culture lab at IIM Udaïpur: https://cclab.iimu.ac.in/. He will start his second term as Associate Editor of JCR in January 2025.
“Regulate first innovate later? An exploration into Autonomous Vehicle Industry”
by İzzet Sıdkı Darandeli
California State University
Place: MA-330
Abstract
This study investigates how innovative activity in specific locations influences the timing and nature of regulatory interventions, focusing on the Autonomous Vehicles (A.V.) sector. Drawing on New Economic Geography and institutional perspectives, it explores the interplay between innovation and regulation, emphasizing the proactive role of innovators in shaping regulatory outcomes. Analyzing patent data and regulatory developments, the research uncovers a significant correlation between innovation levels and regulatory trajectories. Regions with higher concentrations of innovative activity tend to lead regulatory initiatives, fostering conducive environments for technological advancements. Contrary to common perceptions, stringent regulations can catalyze innovation by providing market clarity and stability. By elucidating the spatial dynamics of innovation and regulation, this study offers insights for policymakers aiming to foster innovation ecosystems and sustainable economic growth.
Bio
İzzet Sıdkı Darendeli is the Director of The Smith Center for Entrepreneurship and Associate Professor of Management at California State University, East Bay. He is also an adjunct faculty at Bogaziçi University, Kadir Has University. Darendeli holds a Ph.D. in Strategic Management from Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia. Darendeli has published extensively on International Business, Innovation and Institutions. In addition to his academic successes and research on innovation and entrepreneurship, he has founded, invested, and advised multiple startups and served as a member of the Board of Directors for several Multinational Corporations in the U.S and Europe.
